The method

The shipping floor for AI‑native engineering teams.

Seven named states, event-driven dispatch off your tracker, versioned specialists that fire on a transition, not a clock. Repo, tracker, policy, knowledge, and evidence — one workspace, one accountable loop. Not a product we sell — the operating methodology we run our own company on, written into a book and open on GitHub.

Ship ships Ship

We run our own delivery on the method this page describes.

The engine runs its own delivery loop — tickets, planning, PRs, merges — through the same workspace this page describes. The numbers below come straight from that repository.

1,214

Engine commits since April

288k

Lines of code

385

Commits, last 30 days

50

PRs merged, last 30 days

Cadence · measured from our own delivery

Cadence as a load‑bearing metric, not a bumper sticker.

The numbers an SRE‑literate buyer actually reads — measured from the engine shipping its own changes through this loop. Deployment frequency and lead time are real and verifiable; we don't publish change‑fail or recovery numbers we can't yet measure cleanly. A missing number beats a flattering one.

17

PRs shipped, last 24h

Elite

10 min

Median lead time, open → merge

Elite

85%

PRs merged under an hour

Live

1

PRs in flight right now

Live

Deployment frequency and PRs‑in‑flight read live from the workspace; lead‑time figures are the median over the last 40 merged pull requests on ElMundiUA/ship. Pulled, not rendered — so the promise behind each number is one you can re‑run.

What the method is

A loop with named owners, fenced agents, and a paper trail.

Six properties that compose into one operating model. None of them are features in isolation; together they're what makes the loop legible to a CTO at a glance.

The loop

Seven named states from ticket to merged PR

Backlog → Planning → Executing → Reviewing → Awaiting input → Blocked → Closed, connected by a Default flow. Every ticket is in exactly one. A new hire reads the board on day one.

Named owners

Specialists, not roles in spirit

Planning bundle, Developer, Validation bundle, Reviewer, DevOps, Designer, Clarification specialist. Each stage names which agent acts and which artifact it produces.

Routines

Routines that fire on a transition, not a clock

Delivery dispatches when a ticket's state changes — event-driven, off your tracker. A few jobs stay time-scheduled (daily digest, retro, nightly knowledge); self-heal was retired once the contract got boring enough not to need it.

Evidence

Audit trail as a side-effect, not a project

Every decision, retrieval, and outcome captured as an artifact. The Audit log filters by surface and time. Compliance is grep, not a meeting.

Knowledge

Curated facts the agents actually read

Per-workspace buckets backed by the memory layer. Import sources — repos, web pages, file upload, Notion/Confluence — refresh on a schedule. Nothing publishes silently; every fact passes through review.

Owner-first

Humans stay accountable

Clarifications and approvals are worked through your own agent and the /approve page — no mailbox to babysit. Resolve, approve, or dismiss; every disposition is logged. The merge is yours.

The surfaces, in order

Drive from your agent. Work the decisions. Walk the pipeline.

Your own agent over MCP is the front door; the console is the thin trust surface behind it. A few views carry the rest of the day — the same ones, in the same order, every morning.

Workspace home

Ask your agent what's in flight

No dashboard to monitor. Ask your own agent over MCP and it reads back the priorities feed: what's active, what's waiting on you, the last thing that shipped. If the answer is quiet, the system is quietly doing nothing — that's a finding, not a feature.

Read the docs
your agent · ship MCP
you ▸what's on my plate?
ship ▸8 active · 1 PR in flight · 1 waiting on you.
ship ▸last merge 4 min ago — ELS-274.
you ▸show the one waiting on me
ship ▸approval — auto-merge ELS-289 → main.

Decisions

Approvals, not a mailbox to drain

Only items that need a human: clarifications, approvals, blockers. Your agent surfaces them and you sign off in the same breath — or open the web /approve page for the deliberate ones. Every disposition is logged. Nothing to babysit.

Read the docs
approval · /approve/{id}
ship ▸approval needed:
ship ▸"auto-merge ELS-289 → main"
you ▸approve
ship ▸✓ merged · written to the audit log.

Process · SDLC

The seven-stage pipeline with named specialists

One ticket walks all seven states in order. A transition dispatches the one routine for that stage — planning bundle, implementation, review. You can stand a new hire in front of the board on day one and they can read it.

Read the docs
FSM · dispatch
you ▸ELS-274 → In Progress
✓ planning bundle 12s
✓ implementation 3m
→ code review running
bounded by leases · caps · cascade.

Audit

Every action, one query away

Every workspace, member, integration, pipeline, repo, clarification, invite, and agent action — captured. Query it with audit_search from your agent or the API, filtered by actor, action, and time. If a question can be answered by grep, it is answered here.

Read the docs
audit_search
you ▸audit_search action=pipeline_run.claim
ship ▸41 rows · last 24h
ship ▸actor · action · target · ts
ship ▸ship-agent · claim · ELS-274 · 21:09.

The specialists

Named agents. Versioned roles. Swappable executors.

A specialist is a role definition — "developer", "code reviewer", "validation bundle" — pinned to a stage. The executor (Cursor, Claude Code, Codex, Copilot) plugs in underneath. Swap executors tomorrow and the routine, the specialist, and the process stay unchanged. That separation is the whole method.

Pipeline owners

Planning bundleDeveloperValidation bundleReviewer

Platform

DevOpsSecurityQA automation

Intake / clarify

Intake specialistClarification specialistDesigner review

How our factory runs it

Three pieces of internal machinery. None of them for sale.

Ship

The methodology this whole page describes, and the reference implementation that runs it. Not sold standalone — retainer and fix-sprint clients get a workspace as part of the engagement, a deliverable component rather than a SKU.

Reference implementation ↗

Lighthouse

The memory layer: canonical docs indexed for retrieval, served over MCP with citations. Never a tier, never hosted for sale — open source, read the implementation, run it on your own corpus.

Reference implementation ↗

Buzz

Internal only: the distribution engine that turns audit findings and engagement scars into the field notes and posts you're reading now. No waitlist, no page — its output is the proof.

See what it produces →

Not sold standalone

We won’t sell you the method. We’ll run it on your pipeline.

Retainer and fix-sprint engagements ship a Ship workspace as part of the work. For everyone else: read the reference implementation, read the book, or start with an audit.